The commercial plot was used for the party which affected the people there, CDA
The Islamabad High Court has reserved its decision on the petition against the sealing of PTI’s central secretariat in the CDA operation.
When PTI’s application was heard in the High Court, PTI lawyers Shoaib Shaheen, Umeer Baloch appeared on behalf of CDA, Hafiz Arafat on behalf of CDA, and State Councilor Malik Abdul Rehman from the district administration appeared.
Shoaib Shoaib argued that CDA put notices in their records but there is no mention of the current notice, CDA committed fraud, if seen, two notices have the same number, the notices they sent were PT. Not to I but to Sartaj Ali, he stated in front of the media that we are handing over the land to Sartaj Ali, he also told the media during the operation that we did not notice PTI.
The CDA lawyer took the stand that he himself believed that he bought the commercial plot, changed its use, the commercial plot was used for the party, which is affecting the people there, as much as the permission was given to him. Built more on top of.
The court remarked that if someone has given the plot on rent, to whom will the notice go? Why doesn’t CDA issue notices to owner and tenant on such matters so that the matter is settled at once.
Islamabad High Court Justice Thaman Rifat Imtiaz reserved the decision after hearing the arguments.
(function(d, s, id){
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;}
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.3&appId=770767426360150”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_GB/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.7”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));