occupation of land;  Deadline for submission of representation letter to petitioner's lawyer against Faiz Hameed

Islamabad: In the human rights case against Faiz Hameed on the charge of land grabbing, the Supreme Court has given time to the petitioner’s lawyer to submit a letter of representation.

During the hearing, Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa, speaking to the petitioner, said that you have made serious allegations in the petition, whether you will appear in the case yourself or through a lawyer.

The petitioner said that my lawyer has not submitted the affidavit, we got a call only yesterday, so the case should be adjourned.

The Chief Justice of Pakistan remarked that they cannot even postpone your case, so you should submit the lawyer’s letter, then the case will be heard.

The hearing resumed after a break on the application against General (R) Faiz Hameed, then the lawyer for the petitioner stated that on May 12, 2017, Moeez Khan and his family were abducted.

The Chief Justice said in his remarks that what can the court do in this regard? Did the Supreme Court take any notice on this matter?

The petitioner’s lawyer said that the Supreme Court had not taken any action directly, the Ministry of Defense is authorized to conduct an inquiry. The Chief Justice remarked that the application of a woman named Zahida is also pending.

Lawyer Mueez Ahmed said that Zahida has passed away, if they give a copy of the application, they will review it. The Chief Justice remarked that he cannot give a date after the review, he will hold the hearing after the tea break.

The hearing resumed after half an hour break

The Chief Justice of Pakistan, talking to the petitioner’s lawyer, said that we are telling you what we have understood so far from this case, British citizen Zahida Aslam filed a case under Article 184 three in the Supreme Court in 2017 and former Chief Justice Saqib Nisar called the parties in his chamber in November 2018 and conducted the case.

The Chief Justice of Pakistan inquired whether the Chief Justice of Pakistan can conduct the case by summoning the parties as a single judge in the chamber. In the case, Chief Justice Saqib Nisar himself took notice of FIA, Police and CTD etc. Zahida Aslam also placed a similar request before Chief Justice Gulzar. were filed and the petition before us is also filed under 184 three.

Justice Athar Manullah remarked that there is a difference between the Human Rights Cell and the Supreme Court, do not go into the facts of the case and I had declared in my decision in the Islamabad High Court that the Human Rights Cell is illegal, the Human Rights Cell is not a law. Not established under

Justice Athar Manullah remarked that the worst injustices have been done by the Human Rights Cell in the past. How did the hearing?

(function(d, s, id){
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;}
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.3&appId=770767426360150”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_GB/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.7”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

Please complete the required fields.
We are seeking your cooperation to ensure transparency, accuracy and accountability to our readership whenever we make an error or need to clarify /correct the post.




By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *