The Supreme Court of Pakistan rejected the plea of injunction against the nomination in the murder case of Chairman PTI’s lawyer Abdul Razzaq Shar.
A hearing was held in the Supreme Court of Pakistan on the petition against the nomination in the murder of Chairman PTI’s lawyer Abdul Razzaq Shar.
A 2-member bench consisting of Justice Ejazul Ahsan and Justice Ayesha Malik conducted the hearing.
During the hearing, Chairman PTI’s lawyer Latif Khosa came to the rostrum and gave arguments and said that lawyer Abdul Razzaq Shar was killed in Quetta on June 6. The Prime Minister’s Special Assistant accused TV channels that the killing was done by Imran Khan. Is.
Justice Ayesha Malik said that leave the TV channels, tell about the FIR.
Latif Khosa said that the son of slain lawyer Abdul Razzaq Shar filed a case against Imran Khan for his father’s murder. The plaintiff said that his father has filed an Article 6 case against Imran Khan in the High Court, FIR. In the terrorism provisions, the lower court judge did not even look at whether there was evidence against the PTI chairman.
On this occasion, lawyer Latif Khosa, referring to the decision of former Chief Justice Asif Saeed Khosa, said that the 7-member bench of the Supreme Court has given a decision on the provisions of terrorism.
Justice Ijazul Hassan asked that who determines in the FIR whether the provisions of terrorism are to be applied or not?
Advocate Latif Khosa replied that the SHO of the police station has the primary responsibility of making provisions in the FIR.
Justice Ejazul Hassan asked that if the decision of the SHO is wrong, then an application will be made against it in the court or not?
Justice Ayesha Malik asked that sections 6 and 7 of the ATA are found to be wrong, so by which law can they be removed? Who is to decide whether the accused has been booked under wrong provisions?
Justice Ijazul Hassan said that you have the right to go and apply to the relevant forum that wrong provisions have been imposed.
Lawyer Latif Khosa replied that the challan has not yet been produced and the non-bailable warrant of Chairman PTI has been issued.
Justice Ayesha Malik inquired whether you have challenged the JIT?
Defense lawyer Latif Khosa replied that I do not know what is being done against me.
Justice Ijazul Hassan asked which section of the Anti-Terrorism Act empowers the court to form a JIT? The authority to implement the provisions rests with the SHO.
Advocate Latif Khosa said that even the SHO cannot impose terrorism provisions at the stage of investigation.
Justice Ayesha Malik told Latif Khosa that now you are giving arguments against yourself, when the case is at the investigation stage, how can there be a request to close the FIR? Which law allows these provisions to be removed from the FIR?
The Supreme Court rejected PTI chairman’s request for injunction and took the details of the case from the public prosecutor.
The court issued notices to the Advocate General and Prosecutor General Balochistan and other parties.
The Supreme Court also rejected the plea of lawyer Latif Khosa to grant interim bail and injunction against the High Court’s decision.
Latif Khosa requested on this occasion that my client’s life is in danger, please order not to arrest him.
Justice Ijazul Hassan said that we cannot pass any order at this level without hearing the other side, the 2-member bench of the Supreme Court cannot suspend the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court.
Chairman PTI’s lawyer requested to form a larger bench and order the hearing of the case tomorrow.
The court directed to submit the request for constitution of a larger bench to the Chief Justice.
Justice Ijazul Hassan said that it is not our authority to make a larger bench, we are paralyzed in this matter, request the Chief Justice that the case may be decided today, immediately sign today’s order and send it.
Along with this, the Supreme Court adjourned the hearing of the case for an indefinite period.
setTimeout(function(){
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s)
{if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?
n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};
if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;
n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;
t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0];
s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,document,’script’,
‘https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’);
fbq(‘init’, ‘836181349842357’);
fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);
}, 6000);
/*setTimeout(function(){
(function (d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s);
js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.11&appId=580305968816694”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
}, 4000);*/
