In Islamabad, letters subject to vacancy for official residence declared illegal

Instructions for preparation of data of federal employees on the general waiting list for government accommodation

The Islamabad High Court declared illegal the issuance of ‘subject to vacancy’ (subject to vacancy) allotment letters for government accommodation in Islamabad.

Justice Babar Sattar issued a detailed decision to dismiss the contract employee Samira Siddiqui’s petition against cancellation of allotment.

The High Court declared that ‘subject to vacancy’ all the allotment letters will be considered cancelled, the Attorney General and the Ministry of Housing admitted that there is no scope in the rules, the federal government has been violating the accommodation rules in the allotment of government residences. .

The court directed the Secretary Housing to prepare the data of federal employees in the general waiting list for government accommodation and said that the data should be prepared with confirmation from NADRA and the Establishment Division, the waiting list on the website of the Ministry of Housing and Ensure availability of accommodation list within 30 days.

In the decision, it was said that Establishment Division, Ministry of IT, Finance Division and NADRA should provide support in data preparation, Secretary Housing has undertaken that they will conduct a survey to find out who has given the accommodation on rent for allotment. Accommodations can take legal action against renters.

The High Court declared that it directed the Ministry of Housing to display the general waiting list and other priority lists on the Ministry’s website within a month, saying that the High Court does not have the power to take notice of itself under Article 199 of the Constitution. The Housing Ministry’s report on the said application revealed numerous irregularities in the allotment.

The judgment said that this court was not exercising its discretion to issue directions to the government or the scope of the occupancy laws, showed restraint and did not give any definitive decision on the allotment entitlement of any party, the final decision only on the application. It is up to the limit. During the hearing, he left the issue of allotment related irregularities to the concerned authorities.

(function(d, s, id){
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;}
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.3&appId=770767426360150”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));
(function(d, s, id) {
var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_GB/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.7”;
fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
}(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

Please complete the required fields.
We are seeking your cooperation to ensure transparency, accuracy and accountability to our readership whenever we make an error or need to clarify /correct the post.




By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *